{"id":2502,"date":"2019-11-06T20:34:45","date_gmt":"2019-11-06T20:34:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/?p=2502"},"modified":"2020-10-13T17:56:36","modified_gmt":"2020-10-13T17:56:36","slug":"albert-camus-patron-saint-of-editorial-writers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/?p=2502","title":{"rendered":"Albert Camus, Patron Saint of Editorial Writers"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Of all those who\u2019ve had their say, and then some, about Albert Camus, A.J. Liebling likely came closest to summing up his essence when, in a footnote to one of his columns about what we used to call, \u201cThe Press,\u201d he wrote that Camus\u2019 energies \u201cwere dissipated in creative writing and we lost a great journalist.\u201d<\/p>\n

Except I\u2019m not as sure as Liebling was that we \u201clost\u201d Camus as a journalist. If anything, I\u2019m thinking that in the almost 60 years since Camus was killed, at 46, in the crash of his publisher\u2019s sports car, he\u2019s come into even greater definition as a writer whose nonfiction, most especially his journalism, has more to tell us these days than the novels, stories and plays that forged his reputation during his lifetime.<\/p>\n

He was often classified as a philosopher and this seems to me as misapplied as using the same word to describe Norman Mailer. At their respective peaks, both were remarkable, relentlessly penetrating observers, not only of their own psyches, but also of whatever energies were swirling around them. One need only read some of Camus’\u00a0\u00a0Lyrical and Critical Essays<\/em> published posthumously in 1968 and the intensely rendered landscapes of Prague, Oran, Algiers and the Mediterranean to see how he could put a reader alongside him in the places he describes. You also see this fidelity for pertinent detail in his last novel, The First Man\u00a0<\/em>as he vividly evokes what it looked, sounded and even smelled like to be in the houses, neighborhoods and schools of his childhood.<\/p>\n

Tagging Camus as a journalist, however, may seem to devotees a kind of demotion from being the globally revered \u201cconscience\u201d of the Western world. A review of Herbert Lottman\u2019s 1979 Camus biography suggested that the book made its subject sound more like \u201ca species of ballasted newspaperman, a French James Reston.\u201d Clearly this wasn\u2019t meant as a compliment to Lottman, Camus or Reston. (And, by the way: \u201cballasted\u201d?) All those iconic photos of a brooding Camus in an open trench coat, a cigarette dangling Bogart-ishly from his lips seal this overall impression, adding noir<\/em>-ish glamour and affirming to some that there was less than met the eye to Camus\u2019 philosophical repute.<\/p>\n

His journalistic repute, however, remains to me valuable and important. His was the kind of skeptical mind that was even skeptical towards its own skepticism. Journalists insist that this is a worthwhile quality in the abstract; in the workaday world, however, it\u2019s seen as an immobilizing liability. Can\u2019t keep second-guessing yourselves, people! Got to nail something down before deadline.<\/em><\/p>\n

When he nailed things down, Camus was unequivocal and the impact was, if anything, only amplified by the pitch and yaw of his self-inquiries, especially when it came to such subjects as capital punishment (which he was forcefully, persuasively against) and resistance against World War II Nazi occupiers and Vichy collaborators alike.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a shock of recognition to be found on the first page of Camus and<\/em> Combat: Writing 1944-1947<\/em> (Princeton University Press), a collection of his journalism for the French Resistance newspaper for which Camus served as editor-in-chief and editorial writer. In March 1944, the 55th edition of Combat ran his editorial, \u201cAgainst Total War, Total Resistance.\u201d If you\u2019ve been alive and aware over the last few years, the following excerpts are going to feel\u2026eerie to read:<\/p>\n

\u201cLying is never without purpose. Even the most impudent lie, if repeated, often enough, and long enough, always leaves a trace. German propaganda subscribes to this principle, and today we have another example of its application. Inspired by Goebbels\u2019 minions, cheered on by the lackey press, and staged by the Milice <\/em>[a French militia backing German efforts to put down the Resistance], a formidable campaign has just been launched — a guise which seeks, in the guise of an attack on the patriots of the underground and of the Resistance, to divide the French once again. This is what they are saying to Frenchmen: \u2018We are killing and destroying bandits who would kill you if you weren\u2019t there. You have nothing in common with them.\u2019<\/em>
\n \u201cAlthough this lie, reprinted a million times, retains a certain power, stating the truth is enough to repel the falsehood. And here is the truth: it is that the French have everything in common with those whom they are today being taught to fear and despise\u2026<\/em>
\n \u201cDon\u2019t say, \u2018This doesn\u2019t concern me. I live in the country and the end of the war will find me just as I was at the beginning of the tragedy, living in peace.\u2019 Because it does concern you\u2026\u201d<\/em>
\n \u201cThere is only one fight, and if you don\u2019t join it, your enemy will nevertheless supply you with daily proof that that fight is yours. Take your place in it because if the fate of everyone you like and respect concerns you, then once again, rest assured, this fight does concern you. Just tell yourself we will bring to it the great strength of the oppressed, namely solidarity in suffering. That is the force that will ultimately kill the lie, and our common hope is that when that day comes, it will retain enough momentum to inspire a new truth and a new France.\u201d<\/em> (Translated by Arthur Goldhammer).<\/p>\n

This is not writing as evasion, or redirection or submission. This is not writing as an alternative or as an amendment to action. This is writing as\u00a0<\/em>action. To write is to act.<\/p>\n

When Camus wrote this, the occupation and the war were approaching their conclusions. Right now, whatever it is we\u2019ve been going through since 2016 appears to be starting its end. Whether it happens or not, the resonance of these words and, for that matter, of Camus\u2019 other editorials, may never dissipate as long as there are fears and loathing to be exploited by monsters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Of all those who\u2019ve had their say, and then some, about Albert Camus, A.J. Liebling likely came closest to summing up his essence when, in a footnote to one of his columns about what we used to call, \u201cThe Press,\u201d he wrote that Camus\u2019 energies \u201cwere dissipated in creative writing and we lost a great […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[185,812],"tags":[1000,999,1001],"class_list":["post-2502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-on-writing-lit-and-unlit","category-politics-other-disappointments","tag-a-j-liebling","tag-albert-camus","tag-herbert-lottman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2502"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2502\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2851,"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2502\/revisions\/2851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geneseymour.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}